Book Details

PREDICTING FINANCIAL DEFAULT WITH AI BY INTEGRATING TAX PLANNING INSIGHTS ACROSS FIRM LIFE CYCLE PHASES

International Journal of Computer Science (IJCS) Published by SK Research Group of Companies (SKRGC)

Download this PDF format

Abstract

Tax planning has a big impact on financial stability of firms, with efficacy of this planning differing as a firm is subjected to various stages of corporate life cycle. Emphasis in previous studies was for the most part on considering tax planning as an all-purpose strategy, neglecting how a firm's risk of default might change with its level of development. In this study, an attempt is made to fill that gap by focusing on stage-specific effects of tax planning on risk of financial default. Through hazard model regression and random forest assisted predictive analysis using data from the Compustat database, tax planning has been gauged by GAAP ETR as well as its volatility. Tax planning reduces default risk by 3.51% in the Introduction stage and by 6.65% in the Decline because of enhanced liquidity, while default risk rises by 1.92% and 2.36% during Growth and Maturity stages due to inefficient allocation and poor financial discipline in this research. This research provides a dynamic life cycle perspective for aligning tax strategies with firm conditions, thus providing actionable decision-making insights for financial policymakers.

References

1. Hasan, M. M., Al-Hadi, A., Taylor, G., & Richardson, G. (2017). Does a firm’s life cycle explain its propensity to engage in corporate tax avoidance?. European Accounting Review, 26(3), 469-501.

2. Hasan, M. M., Hossain, M., & Habib, A. (2015). Corporate life cycle and cost of equity capital. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 11(1), 46-60.

3. Al?Hadi, A., Chatterjee, B., Yaftian, A., Taylor, G., & Monzur Hasan, M. (2019). Corporate social responsibility performance, financial distress and firm life cycle: evidence from Australia. Accounting & Finance, 59(2), 961-989.

4. Jaafar, H., & Halim, H. A. (2016). Refining the firm life cycle classification method: A firm value perspective. Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 4(2), 112-119.

5. Castro, P., Fernández, M. T. T., Amor-Tapia, B., & de Miguel, A. (2016). Target leverage and speed of adjustment along the life cycle of European listed firms. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 19(3), 188-205.

6. Wilde, J. H., & Wilson, R. J. (2018). Perspectives on corporate tax planning: Observations from the past decade. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 40(2), 63-81.

7. Higgins, D., Omer, T. C., & Phillips, J. D. (2015). The influence of a firm's business strategy on its tax aggressiveness. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(2), 674-702.

8. Islam, M., Fremeth, A., & Marcus, A. (2018). Signaling by early stage startups: US government research grants and venture capital funding. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(1), 35-51.

9. Auerswald, P. E., & Dani, L. (2017). The adaptive life cycle of entrepreneurial ecosystems: the biotechnology cluster. Small Business Economics, 49, 97-117.

10. Cuypers, I. R., Koh, P. S., & Wang, H. (2016). Sincerity in corporate philanthropy, stakeholder perceptions and firm value. Organization Science, 27(1), 173-188.

11. Balakrishnan, K., Blouin, J. L., & Guay, W. R. (2019). Tax aggressiveness and corporate transparency. The accounting review, 94(1), 45-69.

12. Boussaidi, A., & Hamed, M. S. (2015). The impact of governance mechanisms on tax aggressiveness: empirical evidence from Tunisian context. Journal of Asian Business Strategy, 5(1), 1.

13. Cook, M. L. (2018). A life cycle explanation of cooperative longevity. Sustainability, 10(5), 1586.

14. Parviainen, P., Tihinen, M., Kääriäinen, J., & Teppola, S. (2017). Tackling the digitalization challenge: how to benefit from digitalization in practice. International journal of information systems and project management, 5(1), 63-77.

15. Abosede, A. J., Obasan, K. A., & Alese, O. J. (2016). Strategic management and Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) development: A review of literature. International Review of Management and Business Research, 5(1), 315.

16. Assidi, S., Aliani, K., & Omri, M. A. (2016). Tax optimization and the firm's value: Evidence from the Tunisian context. Borsa Istanbul Review, 16(3), 177-184.

17. Nwaobia Appolos, N., Kwarbai Jerry, D., & Ogundajo, G. O. (2016). Tax planning and firm value: Empirical evidence from Nigerian consumer goods industrial sector. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 7(12), 172-183.

18. Coccia, M. (2018). Optimization in R&D intensity and tax on corporate profits for supporting labor productivity of nations. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(3), 792-814.

19. Razali, M. W. M., Ghazali, S. S., Lunyai, J., & Hwang, J. Y. T. (2018). Tax planning and firm value: Evidence from Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(11), 210-222.

20. Trippl, M., Grillitsch, M., Isaksen, A., & Sinozic, T. (2015). Perspectives on cluster evolution: critical review and future research issues. European planning studies, 23(10), 2028-2044.

21. Penna, C. C., & Geels, F. W. (2015). Climate change and the slow reorientation of the American car industry (1979–2012): An application and extension of the Dialectic Issue LifeCycle (DILC) model. Research Policy, 44(5), 1029-1048.

22. Fraser, S., Bhaumik, S. K., & Wright, M. (2015). What do we know about entrepreneurial finance and its relationship with growth?. International small business journal, 33(1), 70-88.

23. Klassen, K. J., Lisowsky, P., & Mescall, D. (2016). The role of auditors, non-auditors, and internal tax departments in corporate tax aggressiveness. The Accounting Review, 91(1), 179-205.

24. Rastogi, N., & Trivedi, M. K. (2016). PESTLE technique–a tool to identify external risks in construction projects. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), 3(1), 384-388.

25. Cook, K. A., Moser, W. J., & Omer, T. C. (2017). Tax avoidance and ex ante cost of capital. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 44(7-8), 1109-1136.

26. Stantcheva, S. (2017). Optimal taxation and human capital policies over the life cycle. Journal of Political Economy, 125(6), 1931-1990.

27. Bauer, A. M. (2016). Tax avoidance and the implications of weak internal controls. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(2), 449-486.

28. Cen, L., Maydew, E. L., Zhang, L., & Zuo, L. (2017). Customer–supplier relationships and corporate tax avoidance. Journal of Financial Economics, 123(2), 377-394.

29. Gaaya, S., Lakhal, N., & Lakhal, F. (2017). Does family ownership reduce corporate tax avoidance? The moderating effect of audit quality. Managerial Auditing Journal, 32(7), 731-744.

30. Watson, L. (2015). Corporate social responsibility, tax avoidance, and earnings performance. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 37(2), 1-21.

Keywords

Tax Planning, Financial Default Risk, GAAP Effective Tax Rate (ETR), Corporate Life Cycle, Life Cycle–Based Tax Strategy, Firm Financial Stability.

Image
  • Format Volume 8, Issue 1, No 3, 2020
  • Copyright All Rights Reserved ©2020
  • Year of Publication 2020
  • Author Rajeswaran Ayyadurai, R.Padmavathy
  • Reference IJCS-SI-024
  • Page No 2555-2571

Copyright 2025 SK Research Group of Companies. All Rights Reserved.