Book Details

ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN FINANCIAL DECISION-MAKING

International Journal of Computer Science (IJCS) Published by SK Research Group of Companies (SKRGC)

Download this PDF format

Abstract

artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping financial decision-making across domains such as credit scoring, trading, insurance underwriting, fraud detection, and wealth management. While AI systems provide substantial improvements in efficiency, scalability, and predictive accuracy, they also introduce significant ethical concerns. These concerns include algorithmic bias, lack of transparency, accountability gaps, privacy risks, and the amplification of systemic financial instability. This paper presents an in-depth examination of these ethical implications, situating them within established moral frameworks and contemporary financial practices. It further develops a comprehensive governance model integrating technical, organizational, and regulatory mechanisms. The paper argues that ethical AI in finance is not merely a compliance requirement but a foundational necessity for sustainable and equitable financial systems.

References

  1. Weapons of Math Destruction — Cathy O'Neil (2016). A seminal work illustrating how algorithmic systems can reinforce inequality and create systemic harm.
  2. Fairness and Machine learning — Solon Barocas, Moritz Hardt, & Arvind Narayanan (2019). Provides a comprehensive framework for understanding bias and fairness in machine learning.
  3. Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning — Moritz Hardt et al. (2016). Introduces key fairness metrics relevant to financial decision systems.
  4. Why Should I Trust You? Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier — Marco Tulio Ribeiro, Sameer Singh, & Carlos Guestrin (2016). Foundational work on model explainability and interpretability.
  5. A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions — Scott Lundberg & Su-In Lee (2017). Introduces SHAP, a widely adopted explainability method.
  6. Bank for International Settlements (2021). Artificial Intelligence in Banking. Discusses practical adoption, risks, and governance challenges in financial AI.
  7. Financial Stability Board (2017). Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Financial Services. Explores systemic risk and regulatory implications.
  8. European Union (2016). General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). A cornerstone regulation governing data privacy and algorithmic accountability.
  9. Deep Learning with Differential Privacy — Martin Abadi et al. (2016). Introduces differential privacy techniques for protecting sensitive data.
  10. World Economic Forum (2020). Ethics and Governance of Artificial Intelligence for Financial Services. Provides actionable frameworks for responsible AI deployment.

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence (AI); Financial Decision-Making; Algorithmic Bias; Fairness in Machine Learning; Explainable AI (XAI); Transparency; Accountability; Ethical AI; Credit Scoring; Algorithmic Trading; Financial Risk Management; Data Privacy; Differential Privacy; Governance Frameworks; Regulatory Compliance; Systemic Risk; Automation Bias; Human-in-the-Loop Systems; Responsible AI; Financial Ethics.

Image
  • Format Volume 14, Issue 1, No 26, 2026
  • Copyright All Rights Reserved ©2026
  • Year of Publication 2026
  • Author Vijayalakshmi Duraisamy
  • Reference IJCS-703
  • Page No 023-028

Copyright 2026 SK Research Group of Companies. All Rights Reserved.